Sunday, April 29, 2012

Happeningz News: News that effects You.


Happeningz News:  News that effects You.

Non-Fiction.  Real News

First off, I will report the news that deals with sex and people who like to party, hang out, people who are single or unattached and some information may pertain to people who are just sexual in any number of ways.  I will be much shorter than the blog author who usually posts this stuff.

Sex Addiction is Not Yet Seen as a mental Illness.

http://www.saahelp.com/DSM-IV.htm reports The American Psychiatric Association does not currently recognize sex addiction as a mental illness. Therefore, no official diagnostic criteria exist for sex addiction. The APA does, however, have classifications that are helpful for understanding sexual behavior disorders. These disorders are called paraphilias.

 Not everyone agrees that hypersexual behavior is indicative of a clinically significant disorder. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-IV 2001) of the American Psychiatric Association does not specifically list sex addiction, or compulsive sexual behavior, as a clinically significant disorder.

 Some sexual disorders are listed in the DSM-IV, but they are few. Most are paraphelic disorders, or disorders that involve behavior that is deemed socially deviant in nature.    The DSM-IV-TR (APA, 2001) lists several paraphelic disorders, such as exhibitionism (302.4), fetishism (302.81), pedophilia (302.2), transvestic fetishism (302.3), and voyeurism (302.82).

The Baltimore Sun also has a report by By Alexia Elejalde-Ruiz, Tribune Newspapers, called is Sex Addiction Real. 
All anyone needs to know from these articles is that sex addiction is not covered by insurance, people who have problems with life because of sex are just out of luck unless it can be called or diagnosed as “something else” that is covered by insurance.

The hope is someone suffering from sexual deviance can get help by getting their sexual addiction diagnosed as another mental illness, like RJ.



Robot Sex: You Can Always Have What You Want

John Roach reported for MSNBC in an article you can find at http://www.futureoftech.msnbc.msn.com/technology/futureoftech/robots-gateway-mind-blowing-sex-734612 “that Lap dances and intercourse with robot prostitutes could help combat human trafficking and the spread of sexually transmitted diseases while teaching us to be better lovers, according to the arguments laid out in the May issue of the journal Futures.”

We live in a time where science fiction is becoming a real world reality, where yesterdays episode of Star Trek dealing with Captain Kirk screwing an android  meets tomorrows reality of some schmuck laying out $1,000 to 10,000 dollars for a robot you can program to do all kinds of weird sex acts.  These robots can be programmed with multiple personalities too.

(Like the woman your with doesn’t have enough personalities for you to deal with)  If you are not with a woman and your prospects for getting into any kind of human relationship is not a real world possibility then a robotic relationship is just the thing you are looking for. 

Rachel Kranz, writing for Nerve.com reports that “it costs about $2,663 a year to maintain your vagina”.  For men who are married that cost is factored in with a whole lot of other things, running the tab for a relationship at least ¼  to ½ of a man’s net worth.  So for guys who want long term sex without a long term ‘human’ relationship this robot sex thing could be the cheap way for a lifetime of unquestioned sexual deviance.

John Roach says in his article that Robots will replace sex workers in Amsterdam and reduce the rate of STD’s.  Of course I slanted this article to infer males are the ones who would buy such a “sex mechanism” but TrueCompanion.com makes male and female robots to quench that inner freak inside of you just waiting to get out…waiting to be jailed or put in a mental institution.  Ask RJ.


If you think this story is sick, put down your coffee and hold on to your chair.


Egyptian Government to Allow Sex with Dead Wives

No, I’m not making this up.  This was first reported by Reuters News Agency who has since pulled this article from their web site.  But it has been picked up by the Huffington Post UK.  

“The Egyptian parliament is allegedly planning to introduce a hugely controversial ‘Farewell Intercourse’ law that will allow men to legally have sex with their deceased wives for up to six hours after their death.

This sickening law, which believes the ‘marital bond’ should still exist even after one of the partners have died, has been drawn up by the Islamist-dominated parliament but is yet to be passed, reports the al-Ahram newspaper.

The post-mortem sex law was originally raised by Moroccan cleric Zamzami Abdul Bari in May 2011.
In a further blow to women’s rights, another proposed law is to have the minimum age of marriage lowered to 14.”  RT.com, a Russian News source has also verified the validity of this report.  Huffington Post UK also reports, “The law has also provoked a fierce reaction between local journalists.

Adding to the controversy, Egyptian journalist Jaber al-Qarmounty has said: ‘This is unbelievable. It is a catastrophe to give the husband such a right.’

‘Has the Islamic trend reached that far? Is there really a draft law in this regard? Are there people thinking in this manner?’
Although there have been reports that this law could be false and planted into the media by sources close to former dictator Hosni Mubarak, there has been no formal confirmation as of yet.”

There have been a number of reports over the years (decades and centuries) of  men having sex with camels, goats, sheep or whatever else causes STD’s.  But what kind of diseases could a man spread from an act of necrophilia?  

Would an Egyptian woman want to marry a man who had a dead spouse? 
How does the world view the Egyptian man or the Muslim male if this law passes?

Oh Well, That's some News that's Happening Now

DC for RJ

3 comments:

  1. I admit that I don't read as much as you fellas but unless muslims start fuckin dead women in the U.S. this story don't mean shit to me.

    I don't need no robot. I can get most women to do what I want when I want. Hows that for hypersexual behavior. Just like turning on the tap.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Somebody please tell me when RJ will return. Ruby only blogs when RJ is out or someone posts pure bullshit. DC is attempting to be like RJ but hasn't used any curse words or even elaborated on some questionable terms in this or other posts. DC is some king of right wing asshole who is fucking up what was a good blog. The 'Staff' needs to get rid of him.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Could you imagine a true to life size robot falling on you as you open the closet you keep it in? Especially a male robot? That would scare the crap out of most people. This robot thing is very odd to me. It seems to be an easy way for the socially inept or any other person with low self esteem to stop trying to attain real human contact and real human relationships. I see the only benefit this robot could offer a person is its germ free and disease free fake genitals. Oh, and the fact that it probably doesn't talk, which would be it's best asset...
    I'm not even going to comment on the post about men having sex.with their dead wives. We already know how crazy other cultures can be, especially that culture....just plain twisted!

    ReplyDelete

Thank you for your comment